SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

Brain Game Tennis

  • LOGIN
  • Zoom
  • Balls
  • Webinars
    • 1: Winning Singles Strategy
    • 2: Winning Doubles Strategy
    • 3: Serve Strategy & Patterns
    • 4: Return Strategy & Patterns
    • 5 FREE 2022 US Open: Alcaraz v Sinner Analysis
    • 6 Net Strategy & Patterns
    • 7: Baseline Strategy & Patterns
    • 8: The Mental Game
    • 9: 25 Favorite Drills
    • 10: Primary & Secondary
    • 11: Break Points & Tie-Breaks
    • 12: Team Djokovic
    • 13: How Not To Lose
    • 14: Forehand Playbook
    • 15: Backhand Playbook
    • 16: Serve +1 Strategy
    • 17: Return +1 Strategy
    • 18: FREE Djokovic 2023 Australia Analysis
    • 19: Drop Shots & Lobs
    • 20: Own The Net & Cover The Lob
    • 21: Serve & Volley | Return & Volley
    • 22: Run Around Forehands
    • 23: Point Score Strategy
    • 24: Andre Agassi Patterns Of Play
    • 25: Anticipation & Positioning
    • 26: ABCD Baseline Locations
    • 27: Winners & Errors
    • 28: Dynamic Defense
    • 29: Match Rituals
    • 30: Volley & Overhead Technique
    • 31: 2023 Wimbledon Alcaraz v Djokovic Analysis
    • 32: Hitting Down The Line
  • Strategy Courses
    • The First 4 Shots
      • The Mode = 1
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Bullseye = 3 Shots
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: 1-7 Shots Breakdown
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Shorter > Longer
      • Men 2015/16 Australian Open: Champion Analysis
      • North Carolina High School Tennis
      • The Serve Shockwave
      • Everyone’s Game Style = First Strike
      • Where Players Lose
      • Junior to Pro First Strike Pathway
      • Men’s College Tennis
      • Women’s College Tennis
      • Boy’s 12’s
      • Boy’s 14’s
      • Boy’s 16’s
      • Boy’s 18’s
      • Girl’s 18’s
    • Short Ball Hunter
      • Baseline v Net
      • Wimbledon Approaching 2002 – 2015
      • 2015 US Open: 2nd Week
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Backhand
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Forehand
      • Junior & College Data
      • Roger Federer Prowling
      • Roger Federer: Hitting A FH v BH Approach
      • Roger Federer: Approach to Forehand v Backhand
      • Roger Federer: Approach Situations
      • Roger Federer: SABR
      • 2015 Australian Open Men: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Women: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Juniors: Best Time To Approach
      • 50-50 Ball
      • Approach Middle
      • Half Court Players
      • Court Position & Time
    • 25 GR Singles
      • Foundations
      • #1 Eight Serve Locations
      • #2 Eight Serve Factors
      • #3 Serve + 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 2
      • #5 Serve Situations
      • #6 First Serves
      • #7 Second Serves
      • #8 Return Situations
      • #9 Returning 1st Serves
      • #10 Returning 2nd Serves
      • #11 Break Points
      • #12 Return Approach
      • #13 Return Winner
      • #14 A B C D
      • #15 Rally Percentages
      • #16 Sword & Shield
      • #17 Run Around Forehand
      • #18 The 2-1
      • #19 Climbing The Ladder
      • #20 Backhand Cage
      • #21 Backhand Line
      • #22 Drop Shots
      • #23 Approaching
      • #24 1st Volley Behind
      • #25 Pass Cross
    • 25 GR Doubles
      • #1 Center Window
      • #2 Where To Stand
      • #3 Forget The Lines
      • #4 Don’t Follow The Ball
      • #5 Don’t Change Directions
      • #6 Don’t Cover The Line
      • #7 Best Serve Locations
      • #8 Best Return Locations
      • #9 The J
      • #10 The V
      • #11 Volley Targets
      • #12 Two Back
      • #13 Lob Returns
      • #14 Lobbing
      • #15 Serve Formations
      • #16 Low Middle
      • #17 Assign The Middle
      • #18 Power Play
      • #19 Home Base
      • #20 Three Feet
      • #21 R. Partner Neutral
      • #22 Fake & Bake
      • #23 Beach Volleyball
      • #24 Not Hitting = Moving
      • #25 Communicate
    • Num3ers
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Ideal Point
      • Be A High % Player
      • Faster Future
      • Grinding
      • Long Rallies Don’t Matter
      • The Bottom Line: Women
      • The Bottom Line: Men
    • Dou8les Num3ers
      • Building Blocks
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Last Shot: Net v Baseline
      • Last Shot: Server v Returner
      • Last Shot: Winner v Error
      • Last Shot: Serving Team
      • Last Shot: Returning Team
      • 1st Serves
      • 2nd Serves
      • Unreturned Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Groundstroke Winners
      • Stephen Huss – 2005 Wimbledon Champion
    • Between The Points
      • Introduction
      • Two Matches
      • 5 Step Routine
      • 3 Opponents
      • Strings
      • Voices In My Head
      • 55%
      • Leaking Cup
      • Storm Cloud
      • Finish Line
      • Getting Tight: Sample Page
      • Federico Coria: Fear
      • Andre Agassi: Shower
      • Djokovic 2014 Wimbledon
    • Million Pts College Tennis
      • Points Won/Lost
      • Total Net Points
      • Net Points Won
      • Serve +1 FH / BH
      • Serve +1 Errors
      • Serve +1 Winners
      • Serve +1: 3 Outcomes
      • Return +1 FH / BH
      • Return +1 Winners
      • Return +1 Errors
      • Return +1: 3 Outcomes
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • 1st Serves Deuce Court
      • 1st Serves Ad Court
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • 2nd Serves Deuce Court
      • 2nd Serves Ad Court
      • Deuce Court Aces
      • Ad Court Aces
      • Double Faults / 2nd Serves Lost
      • Deuce Court Double Faults
      • Ad Court Double Faults
      • Serving: Deuce & Ad Combined
      • Return Errors
      • Return Errors – Deuce Ct
      • Return Errors – Ad Court
      • Return Errors vs 1st Serves
      • Return Errors vs 2nd Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Deuce Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Deuce Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
    • Getting Tight
      • Getting Tight – Introduction
      • Getting Hijacked
      • Permission To Miss
      • Pre-Match 1 – Expectations
      • Pre-Match 2 – Visualize
      • Pre-Match 3 – Filters
      • Pre-Match 4 – Arousal
      • Set 1 – Adrenalin
      • Set 1 – Internally Focused
      • Set 1 Permission Slips
      • Sets 2&3 – Exhausted
      • Sets 2&3 – Survival Mode
      • Sets 2&3 – Backhand Permission
      • Match Analytics 1
      • Match Analytics 2
      • Match Analytics 3
      • Match Analytics 4
      • Match Analytics 5
      • On Court – Drop Shot
      • On Court – Backhand Line
      • On Court – Return Of Serve
      • Francisco Clavet – 1
      • Francisco Clavet – 2
      • Francisco Clavet – 3
      • Review 1
      • Review 2
      • Review 3
      • Match: Jeff 1st Serves
      • Match: Jeff 2nd Serves
      • Match: Francisco 1st Serves
      • Match: Francisco’s 2nd Serves
      • Match Intelligence 1
      • Match Intelligence 2
      • Match Intelligence 3
    • GamePlan
      • Welcome To GAMEPLAN
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • First Point Serving
      • The 43% Upgrade
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • Break Points
      • Returns: Forehand v Backhand
      • Returns: Made/Winners/Errors
      • Returns: Deuce Court
      • Returns: Ad Court
      • Double Faults
      • The First 4 Shots: Murray v Nishikori
      • Strategy Analysis 1 – Becoming No. 1 In The World
      • Strategy Analysis 2 – Climbing The Rankings
    • Dirtballer
      • START HERE — Introduction
      • Men Rally Length: 2017 RG vs US Open
      • Women Rally Length: 2017 RG vs. US Open
      • 2016 RG vs 2017 Australian Open
      • Nadal Dominance On Clay
      • Nadal Career Stats – Clay vs Hard
      • Rafael Nadal: 23 Masters 1000 Matches
      • More Lessons
  • Presentations
  • Blog
  • About Craig
    • Success Stories
    • Team Djokovic 2017-2019
    • Interviews
    • Tennis Channel Feature: Moneyball In Tennis
    • Tennis Channel One Minute Clinics
    • Tennis Magazine Feature
    • Border Mail Front Page
    • ATP Match Analysis
    • ATP Beyond The Numbers
    • Craig In The News
Buy Tennis Strategy
  • Home
  • Uncategorized
  • Nobody Knows How To Play Novak
CLICK HERE To Purchase Webinars & Courses.
Monday, 03 July 2023 / Published in Uncategorized

Nobody Knows How To Play Novak

2023 Wimbledon Match Updates: Bottom Of The Page


Nobody knows how to play Novak.

Novak Djokovic has won 28 straight matches at Wimbledon since 2018 and is looking to tie Roger Federer with eight titles at The Championships this year. Why is the Super Serb so dominant at SW19? Because opponents don’t do their homework, don’t modify their game plan, and don’t bring nearly enough pressure to the front of the court.

They stay back where they feel safe. It’s a killing zone.

Novak cleverly picks them off one by one at the baseline. He has only lost one baseline battle in four years (vs. Soonwoo Kwon) and adapted his game plan that day to dominate at the net. Problem solved.

Consider the following match stats since 2018.

  • Novak has served and volleyed more than his opponents (86 to 84).
  • Novak has been more to net than his opponents (785 to 748).
  • Opponents finished the point more at the baseline (3078 to 3041) – and got smashed.

These three statistics are all in reverse order for Novak’s less-prepared opponents. 

Novak’s twenty-eight straight victories are less about Novak than you think. Opponents play a game style that feels comfortable to them but actually has almost zero chance of securing victory.

Beating Novak lately at Wimbledon has proven mission impossible.

He has the ball on a string on the exquisitely low-bouncing grass courts. The match is over most times before both players even walk out onto Centre Court.

Let’s break down the three strategic areas where Djokovic dominates.

1) The Baseline

Novak is the best in the world from the back of the court and has been for at least a decade. Trying to consistently beat him in groundstroke exchanges is an absurd proposition.

Baseline Points Won – 28 Matches (2018-2022)

  • Opponents = 37.7% (1160/3078)
  • Novak = 53.9% (1639/3041)

It does not matter what baseline win percentage you have before you play Novak. He is going to grind it into flour. Novak has won 53.9% of his baseline points in four years. That’s actually a really impressive number, as it groups together all points he has won against opponents at their baseline and net. 

If you do even a modicum of pre-match homework, you will realize that going toe-to-toe against Novak from the back of the court is a really, really bad idea. 

Sit down and consider this…

Only seven times from 28 matches has Novak won less than 50% of his baseline points. 

Not one single opponent has won 50% of their baseline points against him. The highest was Soonwoo Kwon at 47.3% (53/112). 

And this is where things get bat*&^% crazy. Novak’s opponents think it’s a great idea to stay back and rally against him from the baseline. Novak’s opponents have finished the point 3078 times at the baseline. Novak has been back there 3041 times. 

That’s a failed, broken, ridiculous strategy. It is quite possibly the worst thing you can do against the best player of all time. 

  • Nick Kyrgios finished the point 100 times against Novak in the 2022 final. He won just 33 of those points.
  • Thanasi Kokkinakis (27.8%), Kevin Anderson (29.0%), Ugo Humbert (29.3%), Horacio Zeballos (29.0%), and Tennys Sandgren (28.7%) all won less than 30% of their baseline points against Djokovic. They combined to play 393 from the baseline. Why? Why?

2) Net Points Won

This is a no-brainer. You have to attack the best baseliner of all time. You have to come to the net as much as possible to escape the onslaught from the back of the court and also dine on the higher win percentage at the net. It’s common sense. It didn’t happen.

Net Points Won – 28 Matches (2018-2022)

  • Opponents = 60.8% won (455/748)
  • Novak = 72.9% won (572/785)

Novak came to the net more (785 to 748) than his opponents and won 12 percentage points more at the net. Opponents won 60.8% at the net and only 37.7% on average at the baseline. Why in the world would you not be swarming the net simply by following the winning percentages?

Denis Shapovalov won a solid 76.9% (30/39) at the net against Novak in their 2021 semi-final. He only won 34.7% (35/101) at the baseline. Thirty-nine times at net for Denis is commendable. 101 times at the baseline is not. It begs the question, “what would have happened if the Canadian swapped out another 20-30 baseline points into net points?”

3) Serve & Volley

Shapovalov served and volleyed twice in his semi-final against Novak and won both of them. Why didn’t he do it more? His big lefty serve is not easy to return on grass. Think of the net pressure another 15-20 serve and volley points might have produced.

Serve & Volley Points Won – 28 Matches (2018-2022)

  • Opponents = 69.0% won (58/84)
  • Novak = 86.0% won (74/86)

Serve and volley is an ideal way to immediately switch out a baseline point for a net point. It is imperative opponents serve and volley more than Novak because they are just going to get chopped from the back of the court anyway. Novak served and volleyed 86 times, and his opponents were slightly less at 84. They needed to be at least double his total – whatever that might be.

Roget Federer served and volleyed just 15 times in the 2019 final against Novak. He won 13. Roger won 40% at the baseline (88/220) but 86.7% serving and volleying. The math here is so obvious. Roger also won 78.1% (50/64) overall at net. The net was his safe haven. The back of the court was never going to produce a winning percentage over 50% against Novak. Yet, the Swiss stayed back there 220 times. Novak won 49.6% from the baseline against Roger. Novak won this battle and saved two match points and won the match.

What would have happened if Roger came to the net more? Let the win percentages answer that question for you.

Novak’s 1st round opponent at Wimbledon this year is 68th-ranked Pedro Cachin from Argentina. He has won three Grand Slam matches in his career. Let’s see how Pedro organizes his game plan today against Novak.

Cheers,

Craig


2023 Wimbledon Match Updates

Round 1: Novak Djokovic def. Pedro Cachin 6-3, 6-3, 7-6(4)

There is a really good chance Pedro, from Argentina, is a big fan of playing from the  baseline. As we read from the analysis above, that’s not a good idea against Novak. Here are the key metrics from their Round 1 match.

Serve & Volley Points

  • Pedro = Won 7/9
  • Novak = Won 6/10

Firstly, it’s impressive that Pedro served and volleyed nine times in the match. Only Roger Federer (15) and Nick Kyrgios (14) served and volleyed more than Pedro in the previous 28 matches. So that alone is a small win. Winning 7/9 is also impressive. But it also begs the question… what would have happened if he came in double or triple that amount? The general rule of thumb is Novak can’t serve and volley more than the opponent. So that stat ends up as a narrow loss.

Net Points Won

  • Pedro = Won 21/33
  • Novak = Won 23/35

Pedro came to the net 33 times, which is very commendable over three sets. It should have been more. Don’t stop doing a good thing for goodness sake! Coming to the net 11 times a set on grass is okay but there is certainly room to come in a lot more.

Baseline Points Won

  • Pedro = Won 30/88 (34%)
  • Novak = Won 48/84 (57%)

This is where Novak squeezes the life out of you.

Pedro finished the point 88 times at the back of the court and only won one out of three points. If you have already read the analysis above, you know this is to be expected. Novak won an extremely healthy 57% of his baseline points. The baseline feels like a safe place to be – but it’s a trap. Stay back in your comfort zone, and you will fall further and further behind in the point against Novak. Picture him as a finger puppet, controlling every move of the person standing on the other side of the net.

Summary: Pedro performed better than I thought he would in serve and volley and net points won. He perfromed exactly how I thought with baseline points won = not good at all.

Next up for Novak = Jordan Thompson. Aussie, Aussie, Aussie, Oi, Oi, Oi.

Craig


2023 Wimbledon Match Updates

Round 2: Novak Djokovic def. Jordan Thompson 6-3, 7-6(4), 7-5

Finally, someone played Novak the right way. It wasn’t a win, but it was certainly a step forward in the strategy department. Let’s break it down.

Serve & Volley Points

  • Jordan = Won 40/60
  • Novak = Won 5/6

Jordan won 12/14 service games, which is certainly a commendable effort against Novak in the Big House at SW19. Serve and volley was a key component. Jordan won 67% of his serve and volley points which helped create a lot of pressure at the front of the court. This was a masterful strategy that brought the average rally length down to just 2.9 shots. Jordan was always coming forward and Novak knew it but quite often could not counter this aggressive strategy.

Baseline Points Won

  • Jordan = Won 16/58 (28%)
  • Novak = Won 42/73 (58%)

All of the serving and volleying helped reduce the amount of baseline points Jordan had to play against Novak. Jordan played 58 points from the back of the court and could win 28% (16) of them. Jordan did a good job of not trying to battle Novak from the back of the court.

Net Points Won

  • Jordan = Won 46/73
  • Novak = Won 25/36

Jordan played 58 points (44%) from the baseline and 73 points (56%) at net. That’s a huge step forward in avoiding Novak’s favorite pattern of play = baseline strangulation.

Next up for Novak is Stan Wawrinka. Gotta love that match-up!


 

  • Tweet

The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Join 1000's of other tennis players. Enter your email address to get exclusive access to all our latest tennis strategies, including behind the scenes photos, videos & more!

Ten Tennis Strategy Products

Brain Game Tennis is the world leader researching and teaching strategy in tennis. Below are ten products to choose from to remove the guesswork and opinion from your game.

THE FIRST 4 SHOTS

The practice court is clearly broken. Here’s the proof.

Points are "front loaded". By far the majority of the action, and the winning, takes place in THE FIRST 4 SHOTS. The practice court is full of long rallies. Matches are dominated by short rallies. There is a massive disconnect occurring.

We spend too much time grinding, banging balls up and down the middle of the court – that have no real benefit to winning tennis matches.

There are 3 specific rally lengths in tennis. Here is their percentage breakdown of total points.

0-4 Shots = 70%
5-8 Shots = 20%
9+ Shots = 10%

The First 4 Shots is specifically the serve, return, Serve +1 groundstroke and Return +1 groundstroke. Those are normally the shots that get practiced the least, but matter the most to winning tennis matches.

Short Ball Hunter

The net is an extremely high percentage place to be!

If you love playing tennis for fun, spend as much time at the baseline as you like. But if you compete – if the score matters – then you must turn your attention to the net to maximize your potential.

The “herd mentality” in tennis thinks it’s too tough to approach the net in today’s game. The conversation starts with improved string technology, more powerful rackets, and finishes with stronger, faster athletes. The herd think approaching is a relic of the past. The herd is WRONG!

AVERAGE WIN %
Baseline = 46%
Net = 66%

Data from ALL Grand Slams provides the facts about approach and volley, and the data is crystal clear – it’s immensely better than staying back at the baseline, grinding for a living.

Num3ers

The baseline is a tough place to create separation. Here's how to do it.

At the 2012 US Open, only 7 men and 14 women had a winning percentage from the baseline. At Wimbledon 2016, Andy Murray won the title only winning 52% of his baseline points - and he is one of the very best at it in the world!

Num3ers deeply explores the data that rules points, especially from the back of the court. Take a "deep dive" into all three rally lengths (0-4, 5-8, 9+), and winner and errors totals from the elite level of our game. The numbers will shock you!

All 4 Grand Slams

Forcing Errors = 41% Men / 37% Women
Winners = 32% Men / 29% Women
Unforced Errors = 27% Men / 34% Women

Num3ers is very much like putting a jigsaw puzzle together. It's about bringing together different data sets together to create the big picture.

Dou8les Num3ers

Doubles Numbers

Every recorded match from the 2015 Australian Open - Rd2 to the final.

There is a lot happening on a doubles court. Situations and strategies are constantly being adjusted to create mis-matches with court position. It's hard to keep track of - until now. Dou8les Num3ers is the most comprehensive analysis of doubles data in our sport. The focus is on how a point ends, and it's broken down eight ways to Sunday. Specifically, you find critical information on:

Winners rise to the #1 way a point ends (over forced & unforced errors)

- The last shot of the rally is overwhelmingly struck at the net.
- Center Window: the most important part of a doubles court to control.
- Stephen Huss: an in-depth interview on Wimbledon's Centre Court with the 2005 Wimbledon Doubles Champion.

Dou8les Num3ers leaves no stone unturned. Percentage breakdowns of how often the server or receiver hits the last shot highlight the dramatic influence of the serve. The last shot of the rally is significant, and is broken down into the following categories: volleys, overheads, passing shots, lobs and groundstrokes.

between the points

When you play a match, you actually play two matches.

When you walk out onto a tennis court, there are two matches that you are about to play. The first is during the point - a part of the match that you have spent a lot of time preparing for on the practice court. But there is a second match, that takes place in the 20 seconds between the points. This is where the mental and emotional aspects of our sport kick in.

Let's face it, there will be adversity in almost every tennis match that you play. The storm clouds are coming. How bug they are, and how long they last for, are up to you.

Between the points is very tennis specific. It provides a roadmap for the 20 seconds between the points, teaching how to handle the adversity that will surely come, and how to build on the successes that will also be present. Your mind is your biggest asset in a match, and Between the Points takes your hand off the self destruct button and stops you beating yourself.

25 golden rules of singles strategy

You don't have to be good at everything, but you have got to be good at something.

You can break tennis down into four key elements - serving, returning, rallying and approaching. Each part has specific patterns of play that consistently deliver higher winning percentages than the others. No more guessing. No more opinions. All facets of our sport are covered in this exceptional product, clearly outlining what patterns to gravitate to, and how to best construct the practice court. Data comes primarily from the 2015 Australian Open.

Building Blocks

MEN = 70% errors / 30% winners
WOMEN = 74% errors / 26% winners

Forcing errors is the best way to construct a point.
You can simply break tennis down into primary and secondary patterns of play - and they are all covered here. Primary patterns include serve and return direction, forehands v backhands, and the best way to approach the net. Secondary patterns include drop shots, serve & volley and 1st volley options. If you play tournaments, this product will greatly help you simplify the singles court.

25 golden rules of doubles

The conversation starts & ends with the Center Window.

The doubles court is like an hourglass. There are two big ends, but a small neck in the middle where all the action happens. Once you learn the power of the Center Window, where you stand to start the point will take on a lot more significance.

Doubles is a lot more about situations, with four people on the court all "dancing" with one another. Learn all the best doubles patterns, broken down for the server, returner, server's partner and the returner's partner.

Doubles Situations

The "J" - the most ideal movement for the returner's partner to attack the net.

The "V" - a better way of understanding where the server's partner should move to.

Volley Targets - there are four main areas to attack. Know which ones are higher percentage. Beach Volleyball - the idea of a "setter" and "spiker" is ideal for the doubles court.

There are certain parts of the court that the ball travels to a lot, and other low percentage areas that you really don't want to cover at all - like the alley! In general, the serving team wants to keep the ball in the middle of the court as much as possible (to help the server's partner), while the returning team benefits from hitting wider and creating more chaos in the point.

Dirtballer

Dirtballer clay court tennis course

Getting Tight

Getting Tight tennis strategy course

Welcome to our Twitter Feed

Tweets by @BrainGameTennis

Join The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Enter your email address to get exclusive, behind the scenes photos, videos and interviews!

Contact Craig O’Shannessy







    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Your Message

    • GET SOCIAL

    © 2019 Brain Game Tennis.
    Designed & Directed by Craig O'Shannessy

    TOP