SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

Brain Game Tennis

  • LOGIN
  • Match IQ
  • Webinars
    • 1: Winning Singles Strategy
    • 2: Winning Doubles Strategy
    • 3: Serve Strategy & Patterns
    • 4: Return Strategy & Patterns
    • 5 2022 US Open: Alcaraz v Sinner Analysis
    • 6 Net Strategy & Patterns
    • 7: Baseline Strategy & Patterns
    • 8: The Mental Game
    • 9: 25 Favorite Drills
    • 10: Primary & Secondary
    • 11: Break Points & Tie-Breaks
    • 12: Team Djokovic
    • 13: How Not To Lose
    • 14: Forehand Playbook
    • 15: Backhand Playbook
  • Strategy Courses
    • The First 4 Shots
      • The Mode = 1
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Bullseye = 3 Shots
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: 1-7 Shots Breakdown
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Shorter > Longer
      • Men 2015/16 Australian Open: Champion Analysis
      • North Carolina High School Tennis
      • The Serve Shockwave
      • Everyone’s Game Style = First Strike
      • Where Players Lose
      • Junior to Pro First Strike Pathway
      • Men’s College Tennis
      • Women’s College Tennis
      • Boy’s 12’s
      • Boy’s 14’s
      • Boy’s 16’s
      • Boy’s 18’s
      • Girl’s 18’s
    • Short Ball Hunter
      • Baseline v Net
      • Wimbledon Approaching 2002 – 2015
      • 2015 US Open: 2nd Week
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Backhand
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Forehand
      • Junior & College Data
      • Roger Federer Prowling
      • Roger Federer: Hitting A FH v BH Approach
      • Roger Federer: Approach to Forehand v Backhand
      • Roger Federer: Approach Situations
      • Roger Federer: SABR
      • 2015 Australian Open Men: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Women: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Juniors: Best Time To Approach
      • 50-50 Ball
      • Approach Middle
      • Half Court Players
      • Court Position & Time
    • 25 GR Singles
      • Foundations
      • #1 Eight Serve Locations
      • #2 Eight Serve Factors
      • #3 Serve + 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 2
      • #5 Serve Situations
      • #6 First Serves
      • #7 Second Serves
      • #8 Return Situations
      • #9 Returning 1st Serves
      • #10 Returning 2nd Serves
      • #11 Break Points
      • #12 Return Approach
      • #13 Return Winner
      • #14 A B C D
      • #15 Rally Percentages
      • #16 Sword & Shield
      • #17 Run Around Forehand
      • #18 The 2-1
      • #19 Climbing The Ladder
      • #20 Backhand Cage
      • #21 Backhand Line
      • #22 Drop Shots
      • #23 Approaching
      • #24 1st Volley Behind
      • #25 Pass Cross
    • 25 GR Doubles
      • #1 Center Window
      • #2 Where To Stand
      • #3 Forget The Lines
      • #4 Don’t Follow The Ball
      • #5 Don’t Change Directions
      • #6 Don’t Cover The Line
      • #7 Best Serve Locations
      • #8 Best Return Locations
      • #9 The J
      • #10 The V
      • #11 Volley Targets
      • #12 Two Back
      • #13 Lob Returns
      • #14 Lobbing
      • #15 Serve Formations
      • #16 Low Middle
      • #17 Assign The Middle
      • #18 Power Play
      • #19 Home Base
      • #20 Three Feet
      • #21 R. Partner Neutral
      • #22 Fake & Bake
      • #23 Beach Volleyball
      • #24 Not Hitting = Moving
      • #25 Communicate
    • Num3ers
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Ideal Point
      • Be A High % Player
      • Faster Future
      • Grinding
      • Long Rallies Don’t Matter
      • The Bottom Line: Women
      • The Bottom Line: Men
    • Dou8les Num3ers
      • Building Blocks
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Last Shot: Net v Baseline
      • Last Shot: Server v Returner
      • Last Shot: Winner v Error
      • Last Shot: Serving Team
      • Last Shot: Returning Team
      • 1st Serves
      • 2nd Serves
      • Unreturned Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Groundstroke Winners
      • Stephen Huss – 2005 Wimbledon Champion
    • Between The Points
      • Introduction
      • Two Matches
      • 5 Step Routine
      • 3 Opponents
      • Strings
      • Voices In My Head
      • 55%
      • Leaking Cup
      • Storm Cloud
      • Finish Line
      • Getting Tight: Sample Page
      • Federico Coria: Fear
      • Andre Agassi: Shower
      • Djokovic 2014 Wimbledon
    • Million Pts College Tennis
      • Points Won/Lost
      • Total Net Points
      • Net Points Won
      • Serve +1 FH / BH
      • Serve +1 Errors
      • Serve +1 Winners
      • Serve +1: 3 Outcomes
      • Return +1 FH / BH
      • Return +1 Winners
      • Return +1 Errors
      • Return +1: 3 Outcomes
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • 1st Serves Deuce Court
      • 1st Serves Ad Court
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • 2nd Serves Deuce Court
      • 2nd Serves Ad Court
      • Deuce Court Aces
      • Ad Court Aces
      • Double Faults / 2nd Serves Lost
      • Deuce Court Double Faults
      • Ad Court Double Faults
      • Serving: Deuce & Ad Combined
      • Return Errors
      • Return Errors – Deuce Ct
      • Return Errors – Ad Court
      • Return Errors vs 1st Serves
      • Return Errors vs 2nd Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Deuce Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Deuce Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
    • Getting Tight
      • Getting Tight – Introduction
      • Getting Hijacked
      • Permission To Miss
      • Pre-Match 1 – Expectations
      • Pre-Match 2 – Visualize
      • Pre-Match 3 – Filters
      • Pre-Match 4 – Arousal
      • Set 1 – Adrenalin
      • Set 1 – Internally Focused
      • Set 1 Permission Slips
      • Sets 2&3 – Exhausted
      • Sets 2&3 – Survival Mode
      • Sets 2&3 – Backhand Permission
      • Match Analytics 1
      • Match Analytics 2
      • Match Analytics 3
      • Match Analytics 4
      • Match Analytics 5
      • On Court – Drop Shot
      • On Court – Backhand Line
      • On Court – Return Of Serve
      • Francisco Clavet – 1
      • Francisco Clavet – 2
      • Francisco Clavet – 3
      • Review 1
      • Review 2
      • Review 3
      • Match: Jeff 1st Serves
      • Match: Jeff 2nd Serves
      • Match: Francisco 1st Serves
      • Match: Francisco’s 2nd Serves
      • Match Intelligence 1
      • Match Intelligence 2
      • Match Intelligence 3
    • GamePlan
      • Welcome To GAMEPLAN
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • First Point Serving
      • The 43% Upgrade
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • Break Points
      • Returns: Forehand v Backhand
      • Returns: Made/Winners/Errors
      • Returns: Deuce Court
      • Returns: Ad Court
      • Double Faults
      • The First 4 Shots: Murray v Nishikori
      • Strategy Analysis 1 – Becoming No. 1 In The World
      • Strategy Analysis 2 – Climbing The Rankings
    • Dirtballer
      • START HERE — Introduction
      • Men Rally Length: 2017 RG vs US Open
      • Women Rally Length: 2017 RG vs. US Open
      • 2016 RG vs 2017 Australian Open
      • Nadal Dominance On Clay
      • Nadal Career Stats – Clay vs Hard
      • Rafael Nadal: 23 Masters 1000 Matches
      • More Lessons
  • Presentations
  • Blog
  • About Craig
    • Tennis Balls
    • Success Stories
    • Team Djokovic 2017-2019
    • Interviews
    • Tennis Channel Feature: Moneyball In Tennis
    • Tennis Channel One Minute Clinics
    • Tennis Magazine Feature
    • Border Mail Front Page
    • ATP Match Analysis
    • ATP Beyond The Numbers
    • Craig In The News
Buy Tennis Strategy
  • Home
  • WTA
  • 2015 Miami: SAP 50 Match Deep Dive (Part 3 of 4 = Returning)
Two New Webinars: Register Forehand & Backhand Playbooks
Thursday, 23 April 2015 / Published in WTA

2015 Miami: SAP 50 Match Deep Dive (Part 3 of 4 = Returning)

G’day!

The return of serve is a lethal weapon in it’s own right, and has improved a lot in the past decade to efficiently neutralize the serve. The best returners in the world are also the best ranked players – much more of an equivalent effect than with the best servers.

SAP’s outstanding data from Miami let’s us take a closer look at all aspects of the tournament with their 50-match global view. This report is part 3 in the series, so make sure to look at the serve and break point data already presented in the blog.

Part 1 – Serving

Part 2 – Break Points

Ok, so let’s get smarter and break down the critical numbers that matter on the returning side of the game, as well assign a grade.

44% Overall Return Points Won (Grade A)

This is a very solid number that underpins the women’s game. The primary difference between men’s and women’s tennis is the ability to really crush a first serve. The ladies can certainly hit it big, but not huge, which in turn makes the return of serve a bigger factor overall. Forty four percent really isn’t that far away from 50% – which would be a complete push for the serve. This is a fantastic number for the returner, and a real warning that serves should demand a higher winning percentage. Andrea Petkovic had an outstanding tournament returning serve, winning 63% against Christina McHale, 59% against Ekaterina Makarova, and 53% against Karolina Pliskova.

  • Andrea Petkovic 57%
  • Simona Halep 51%
  • Serena Williams 48%
  • Carla Suarez Navarro 45%

41% Overall 1st Serve Return Points Won (Grade A+)

This is a really high number that speaks to both the quality of the return, and also that the 1st serve is not performing quite as it should be. Imagine your opponent hitting their biggest weapon 10 times, and they win six and you win four. I will take the four every day of the week right there. Again, Andrea Petkovic leading the way here. Yes it is situational, and can change a lot with different opponents, but if you are good here then you can go a long way in the game.

  • Andrea Petkovic 55%
  • Simona Halep 48%
  • Serena Williams 45%
  • Carla Suarez Navarro 35%

49% Overall 2nd Serve Return Points Won (Grade B-)

This is surprising low, as it is normally above 50%. At the 2012 U.S. Open, for example, it was at 54.4%. This is the beating heart of winning tennis matches, as you have a great opportunity to really attack your opponent’s serve when it’s a second serve. In fact, having a winning percentage in this area makes you think of this as a “third serve” for you. What’s very interesting is to see Carla Suarez Navarro perform better here than the other three semi-finalists. This gives you a valuable insight into how she goes about crafting her game. Also note that all four semi-finalists are killing the average.

  • Carla Suarez Navarro 61%
  • Andrea Petkovic 58%
  • Simona Halep 55%
  • Serena Williams 54%

51% Overall Return Points Won Contacted Inside Baseline (Grade A+)

Congratulations SAP! This is a stat that I have never seen before. Amazing stuff. So here’s what this means – when players made contact with the ball inside the baseline they won more points than they lost. This is a combined number for first and second serves, and supports the wonderful theory that attacking the return with the feet is a great idea. Stepping in really does work! Have a look at Serena’s crazy number – 82%! Wow. It’s such an integral part of her aggressive game style – step in and use the power of the serve back at the server.

  • Serena Williams 82%
  • Simona Halep 45%
  • Andrea Petkovic 44%
  • Carla Suarez Navarro 28%

47% Overall Returns Made From Inside Baseline (Grade A+)

This number simply states that 47% of all the returns from both first and second serves were contacted inside the baseline. I really like that number. It shows aggression, it shows intent, it shows that the returner is actually coming after the server! Very well done ladies! It should be no surprise that Serena basically makes contact with eight of of ten overall returns inside the baseline. That’s first-strike tennis at it’s finest!

  • Serena Williams 79%
  • Simona Halep 47%
  • Andrea Petkovic 43%
  • Carla Suarez Navarro 19%

32% Overall 1st Serve Returns Contacted Inside Baseline (Grade A)

This is also a number that tells a lot. Just because the server is hitting a first serve does not mean that the returner has to be defensive with their court position. Stepping in and blocking the powerful first serve, and getting the ball back quickly to the server to rush them, is definitely at play here. Basically one out of three first serves are contacted inside the baseline. I like that a lot! Look at the huge disparity here between the players – highlighting the different game styles. Serena is contacting more than two out of three first serves inside the baseline. That’s extremely aggressive!!!

  • Serena Williams 68%
  • Simona Halep 16%
  • Carla Suarez Navarro 3%
  • Andrea Petkovic 1%

70% Overall 2nd Serve Returns Contacted Inside Baseline (Grade A)

Well done ladies! I really like that the feet are so involved in attacking the second serve by stepping in, leaning on the ball, using the energy of the body, shortening the preparation time for the server, and generally rattling their cage with excellent court position. Again, look at Serena. When you miss your first serve against her, you know exactly what’s coming – pain.

  • Serena Williams 100%
  • Andrea Petkovic 97%
  • Simona Halep 87%
  • Carla Suarez Navarro 47%

63mph Average First Serve Return Speed (Grade A-)

This is a solid number, considering the primary objective here is to neutralize the power of the serve, turn the point into a 50-50 battle, and then enforce superior patterns of play onto the opponent. The range, as you would expect, was huge here, all the way from 20mph to 98mph.

  • Serena Williams 69mph
  • Simona Halep 65mph
  • Carla Suarez Navarro 64mph
  • Andrea Petkovic 61mph

71mph Average Second Serve Return Speed (Grade A)

This is exactly where it should be. The average second serve return is 8mph faster as the returner steps in more and can be more aggressive against the slower second serve. When you get a second serve, you have got to attack it, and stepping in and taking it more on the rise inherently gives you more power to fire right back at the server. Very interesting to see Carla Suarez Navarro lead this list. She is standing further back and taking a big cut at her second serve returns. It’a a perfect fit for her game style.

  • Carla Suarez Navarro 76mph
  • Serena Williams 74mph
  • Andrea Petkovic 70mph
  • Simona Halep 69mph

64mph Average Backhand Return Speed (Grade A)

This is a solid number off the backhand wing. For the majority of players, having two hands on this shot certainly helps to get more power on the ball. Yes, you want to attack the backhand return, but the backhand return also puts up solid speed numbers that shows it is certainly no push over. Serena’s numbers stand out again here, as she absolutely has the most feared backhand return of serve in the game. She can rip it really hard and make you immediately feel her pressure.

  • Serena Williams 69mph
  • Andrea Petkovic 64mph
  • Simona Halep 64mph
  • Carla Suarez Navarro 62mph

68mph Average Forehand Return Speed (Grade A)

Again, another solid number that shows that the forehand is a bigger weapon both on the men’s tour and the women’s tour. Those extra four miles per hour over the backhand get the ball to the opponent a fraction of a second earlier, potentially rushing the preparation of the hands and feet. This is the upgrade power effect. This also shows how effective Carla Suarez Navarro is in this area – leading the field with huge forehand returns.

  • Carla Suarez Navarro 74mph
  • Serena Williams 72mph
  • Simona Halep 69mph
  • Andrea Petkovic 66mph

SAP is delivering amazing numbers that are not only cool to know, but are easy to understand and apply. They are “real” numbers that make players, coaches and fans all smarter.

In a few days we will tackle a wealth of data on rallying, which will be the last SAP installment from Miami.

All the best,

Craig

 

 

  • Tweet

The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Join 1000's of other tennis players. Enter your email address to get exclusive access to all our latest tennis strategies, including behind the scenes photos, videos & more!

Ten Tennis Strategy Products

Brain Game Tennis is the world leader researching and teaching strategy in tennis. Below are ten products to choose from to remove the guesswork and opinion from your game.

THE FIRST 4 SHOTS

The practice court is clearly broken. Here’s the proof.

Points are "front loaded". By far the majority of the action, and the winning, takes place in THE FIRST 4 SHOTS. The practice court is full of long rallies. Matches are dominated by short rallies. There is a massive disconnect occurring.

We spend too much time grinding, banging balls up and down the middle of the court – that have no real benefit to winning tennis matches.

There are 3 specific rally lengths in tennis. Here is their percentage breakdown of total points.

0-4 Shots = 70%
5-8 Shots = 20%
9+ Shots = 10%

The First 4 Shots is specifically the serve, return, Serve +1 groundstroke and Return +1 groundstroke. Those are normally the shots that get practiced the least, but matter the most to winning tennis matches.

Short Ball Hunter

The net is an extremely high percentage place to be!

If you love playing tennis for fun, spend as much time at the baseline as you like. But if you compete – if the score matters – then you must turn your attention to the net to maximize your potential.

The “herd mentality” in tennis thinks it’s too tough to approach the net in today’s game. The conversation starts with improved string technology, more powerful rackets, and finishes with stronger, faster athletes. The herd think approaching is a relic of the past. The herd is WRONG!

AVERAGE WIN %
Baseline = 46%
Net = 66%

Data from ALL Grand Slams provides the facts about approach and volley, and the data is crystal clear – it’s immensely better than staying back at the baseline, grinding for a living.

Num3ers

The baseline is a tough place to create separation. Here's how to do it.

At the 2012 US Open, only 7 men and 14 women had a winning percentage from the baseline. At Wimbledon 2016, Andy Murray won the title only winning 52% of his baseline points - and he is one of the very best at it in the world!

Num3ers deeply explores the data that rules points, especially from the back of the court. Take a "deep dive" into all three rally lengths (0-4, 5-8, 9+), and winner and errors totals from the elite level of our game. The numbers will shock you!

All 4 Grand Slams

Forcing Errors = 41% Men / 37% Women
Winners = 32% Men / 29% Women
Unforced Errors = 27% Men / 34% Women

Num3ers is very much like putting a jigsaw puzzle together. It's about bringing together different data sets together to create the big picture.

Dou8les Num3ers

Doubles Numbers

Every recorded match from the 2015 Australian Open - Rd2 to the final.

There is a lot happening on a doubles court. Situations and strategies are constantly being adjusted to create mis-matches with court position. It's hard to keep track of - until now. Dou8les Num3ers is the most comprehensive analysis of doubles data in our sport. The focus is on how a point ends, and it's broken down eight ways to Sunday. Specifically, you find critical information on:

Winners rise to the #1 way a point ends (over forced & unforced errors)

- The last shot of the rally is overwhelmingly struck at the net.
- Center Window: the most important part of a doubles court to control.
- Stephen Huss: an in-depth interview on Wimbledon's Centre Court with the 2005 Wimbledon Doubles Champion.

Dou8les Num3ers leaves no stone unturned. Percentage breakdowns of how often the server or receiver hits the last shot highlight the dramatic influence of the serve. The last shot of the rally is significant, and is broken down into the following categories: volleys, overheads, passing shots, lobs and groundstrokes.

between the points

When you play a match, you actually play two matches.

When you walk out onto a tennis court, there are two matches that you are about to play. The first is during the point - a part of the match that you have spent a lot of time preparing for on the practice court. But there is a second match, that takes place in the 20 seconds between the points. This is where the mental and emotional aspects of our sport kick in.

Let's face it, there will be adversity in almost every tennis match that you play. The storm clouds are coming. How bug they are, and how long they last for, are up to you.

Between the points is very tennis specific. It provides a roadmap for the 20 seconds between the points, teaching how to handle the adversity that will surely come, and how to build on the successes that will also be present. Your mind is your biggest asset in a match, and Between the Points takes your hand off the self destruct button and stops you beating yourself.

25 golden rules of singles strategy

You don't have to be good at everything, but you have got to be good at something.

You can break tennis down into four key elements - serving, returning, rallying and approaching. Each part has specific patterns of play that consistently deliver higher winning percentages than the others. No more guessing. No more opinions. All facets of our sport are covered in this exceptional product, clearly outlining what patterns to gravitate to, and how to best construct the practice court. Data comes primarily from the 2015 Australian Open.

Building Blocks

MEN = 70% errors / 30% winners
WOMEN = 74% errors / 26% winners

Forcing errors is the best way to construct a point.
You can simply break tennis down into primary and secondary patterns of play - and they are all covered here. Primary patterns include serve and return direction, forehands v backhands, and the best way to approach the net. Secondary patterns include drop shots, serve & volley and 1st volley options. If you play tournaments, this product will greatly help you simplify the singles court.

25 golden rules of doubles

The conversation starts & ends with the Center Window.

The doubles court is like an hourglass. There are two big ends, but a small neck in the middle where all the action happens. Once you learn the power of the Center Window, where you stand to start the point will take on a lot more significance.

Doubles is a lot more about situations, with four people on the court all "dancing" with one another. Learn all the best doubles patterns, broken down for the server, returner, server's partner and the returner's partner.

Doubles Situations

The "J" - the most ideal movement for the returner's partner to attack the net.

The "V" - a better way of understanding where the server's partner should move to.

Volley Targets - there are four main areas to attack. Know which ones are higher percentage. Beach Volleyball - the idea of a "setter" and "spiker" is ideal for the doubles court.

There are certain parts of the court that the ball travels to a lot, and other low percentage areas that you really don't want to cover at all - like the alley! In general, the serving team wants to keep the ball in the middle of the court as much as possible (to help the server's partner), while the returning team benefits from hitting wider and creating more chaos in the point.

Dirtballer

Dirtballer clay court tennis course

Getting Tight

Getting Tight tennis strategy course

Welcome to our Twitter Feed

Tweets by @BrainGameTennis

Join The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Enter your email address to get exclusive, behind the scenes photos, videos and interviews!

Contact Craig O’Shannessy







    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Your Message

    • GET SOCIAL

    © 2019 Brain Game Tennis.
    Designed & Directed by Craig O'Shannessy

    TOP
    0