SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

Brain Game Tennis

  • LOGIN
  • Zoom Coaching
  • Webinars
    • 1: Winning Singles Strategy
    • 2: Winning Doubles Strategy
    • 3: Serve Strategy & Patterns
    • 4: Return Strategy & Patterns
    • 5 FREE 2022 US Open: Alcaraz v Sinner Analysis
    • 6 Net Strategy & Patterns
    • 7: Baseline Strategy & Patterns
    • 8: The Mental Game
    • 9: 25 Favorite Drills
    • 10: Primary & Secondary
    • 11: Break Points & Tie-Breaks
    • 12: Team Djokovic
    • 13: How Not To Lose
    • 14: Forehand Playbook
    • 15: Backhand Playbook
    • 16: Serve +1 Strategy
    • 17: Return +1 Strategy
    • 18: FREE Djokovic 2023 Australia Analysis
    • 19: Drop Shots & Lobs
    • 20: Own The Net & Cover The Lob
  • Strategy Courses
    • The First 4 Shots
      • The Mode = 1
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Men: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Round by Round
      • Women: 2015/16 Australian Open Average Rally Length
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Bullseye = 3 Shots
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: 1-7 Shots Breakdown
      • 2015/16 Australian Open: Shorter > Longer
      • Men 2015/16 Australian Open: Champion Analysis
      • North Carolina High School Tennis
      • The Serve Shockwave
      • Everyone’s Game Style = First Strike
      • Where Players Lose
      • Junior to Pro First Strike Pathway
      • Men’s College Tennis
      • Women’s College Tennis
      • Boy’s 12’s
      • Boy’s 14’s
      • Boy’s 16’s
      • Boy’s 18’s
      • Girl’s 18’s
    • Short Ball Hunter
      • Baseline v Net
      • Wimbledon Approaching 2002 – 2015
      • 2015 US Open: 2nd Week
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Backhand
      • 2015 US Open: Approach To The Forehand
      • Junior & College Data
      • Roger Federer Prowling
      • Roger Federer: Hitting A FH v BH Approach
      • Roger Federer: Approach to Forehand v Backhand
      • Roger Federer: Approach Situations
      • Roger Federer: SABR
      • 2015 Australian Open Men: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Women: Best Time To Approach
      • 2015 Australian Open Juniors: Best Time To Approach
      • 50-50 Ball
      • Approach Middle
      • Half Court Players
      • Court Position & Time
    • 25 GR Singles
      • Foundations
      • #1 Eight Serve Locations
      • #2 Eight Serve Factors
      • #3 Serve + 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 1
      • #4 Serve & Volley Part 2
      • #5 Serve Situations
      • #6 First Serves
      • #7 Second Serves
      • #8 Return Situations
      • #9 Returning 1st Serves
      • #10 Returning 2nd Serves
      • #11 Break Points
      • #12 Return Approach
      • #13 Return Winner
      • #14 A B C D
      • #15 Rally Percentages
      • #16 Sword & Shield
      • #17 Run Around Forehand
      • #18 The 2-1
      • #19 Climbing The Ladder
      • #20 Backhand Cage
      • #21 Backhand Line
      • #22 Drop Shots
      • #23 Approaching
      • #24 1st Volley Behind
      • #25 Pass Cross
    • 25 GR Doubles
      • #1 Center Window
      • #2 Where To Stand
      • #3 Forget The Lines
      • #4 Don’t Follow The Ball
      • #5 Don’t Change Directions
      • #6 Don’t Cover The Line
      • #7 Best Serve Locations
      • #8 Best Return Locations
      • #9 The J
      • #10 The V
      • #11 Volley Targets
      • #12 Two Back
      • #13 Lob Returns
      • #14 Lobbing
      • #15 Serve Formations
      • #16 Low Middle
      • #17 Assign The Middle
      • #18 Power Play
      • #19 Home Base
      • #20 Three Feet
      • #21 R. Partner Neutral
      • #22 Fake & Bake
      • #23 Beach Volleyball
      • #24 Not Hitting = Moving
      • #25 Communicate
    • Num3ers
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Ideal Point
      • Be A High % Player
      • Faster Future
      • Grinding
      • Long Rallies Don’t Matter
      • The Bottom Line: Women
      • The Bottom Line: Men
    • Dou8les Num3ers
      • Building Blocks
      • 3 Types of Points – Men
      • 3 Types of Points – Women
      • Average Rally Length
      • Last Shot: Net v Baseline
      • Last Shot: Server v Returner
      • Last Shot: Winner v Error
      • Last Shot: Serving Team
      • Last Shot: Returning Team
      • 1st Serves
      • 2nd Serves
      • Unreturned Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Groundstroke Winners
      • Stephen Huss – 2005 Wimbledon Champion
    • Between The Points
      • Introduction
      • Two Matches
      • 5 Step Routine
      • 3 Opponents
      • Strings
      • Voices In My Head
      • 55%
      • Leaking Cup
      • Storm Cloud
      • Finish Line
      • Getting Tight: Sample Page
      • Federico Coria: Fear
      • Andre Agassi: Shower
      • Djokovic 2014 Wimbledon
    • Million Pts College Tennis
      • Points Won/Lost
      • Total Net Points
      • Net Points Won
      • Serve +1 FH / BH
      • Serve +1 Errors
      • Serve +1 Winners
      • Serve +1: 3 Outcomes
      • Return +1 FH / BH
      • Return +1 Winners
      • Return +1 Errors
      • Return +1: 3 Outcomes
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • 1st Serves Deuce Court
      • 1st Serves Ad Court
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • 2nd Serves Deuce Court
      • 2nd Serves Ad Court
      • Deuce Court Aces
      • Ad Court Aces
      • Double Faults / 2nd Serves Lost
      • Deuce Court Double Faults
      • Ad Court Double Faults
      • Serving: Deuce & Ad Combined
      • Return Errors
      • Return Errors – Deuce Ct
      • Return Errors – Ad Court
      • Return Errors vs 1st Serves
      • Return Errors vs 2nd Serves
      • Return Winners
      • Deuce Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Deuce Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 1st Serve Returns
      • Ad Ct: 2nd Serve Returns
    • Getting Tight
      • Getting Tight – Introduction
      • Getting Hijacked
      • Permission To Miss
      • Pre-Match 1 – Expectations
      • Pre-Match 2 – Visualize
      • Pre-Match 3 – Filters
      • Pre-Match 4 – Arousal
      • Set 1 – Adrenalin
      • Set 1 – Internally Focused
      • Set 1 Permission Slips
      • Sets 2&3 – Exhausted
      • Sets 2&3 – Survival Mode
      • Sets 2&3 – Backhand Permission
      • Match Analytics 1
      • Match Analytics 2
      • Match Analytics 3
      • Match Analytics 4
      • Match Analytics 5
      • On Court – Drop Shot
      • On Court – Backhand Line
      • On Court – Return Of Serve
      • Francisco Clavet – 1
      • Francisco Clavet – 2
      • Francisco Clavet – 3
      • Review 1
      • Review 2
      • Review 3
      • Match: Jeff 1st Serves
      • Match: Jeff 2nd Serves
      • Match: Francisco 1st Serves
      • Match: Francisco’s 2nd Serves
      • Match Intelligence 1
      • Match Intelligence 2
      • Match Intelligence 3
    • GamePlan
      • Welcome To GAMEPLAN
      • 1st Serve Percentage
      • 1st Serve Points Won
      • First Point Serving
      • The 43% Upgrade
      • 2nd Serve Points Won
      • Break Points
      • Returns: Forehand v Backhand
      • Returns: Made/Winners/Errors
      • Returns: Deuce Court
      • Returns: Ad Court
      • Double Faults
      • The First 4 Shots: Murray v Nishikori
      • Strategy Analysis 1 – Becoming No. 1 In The World
      • Strategy Analysis 2 – Climbing The Rankings
    • Dirtballer
      • START HERE — Introduction
      • Men Rally Length: 2017 RG vs US Open
      • Women Rally Length: 2017 RG vs. US Open
      • 2016 RG vs 2017 Australian Open
      • Nadal Dominance On Clay
      • Nadal Career Stats – Clay vs Hard
      • Rafael Nadal: 23 Masters 1000 Matches
      • More Lessons
  • Presentations
  • Blog
  • About Craig
    • Tennis Balls
    • Success Stories
    • Team Djokovic 2017-2019
    • Interviews
    • Tennis Channel Feature: Moneyball In Tennis
    • Tennis Channel One Minute Clinics
    • Tennis Magazine Feature
    • Border Mail Front Page
    • ATP Match Analysis
    • ATP Beyond The Numbers
    • Craig In The News
Buy Tennis Strategy
  • Home
  • Novak Djokovic
  • 10 Keys To Novak’s 2021 Wimbledon Success
Register For Upcoming Webinars
Monday, 12 July 2021 / Published in Novak Djokovic, Wimbledon

10 Keys To Novak’s 2021 Wimbledon Success

 


Imagine winning Wimbledon… one, two, three, four, five… six times!!!

Novak just powered through the 2021 Wimbledon draw for the loss of just two sets. Dominant. Controlling. Commanding. Superior. Supreme.

Here are 10 keys to his tournament victory.

1: Serve & Volley = 88% Won (36/44)

Novak served and volleyed nine times in the final against Matteo Berrettini, winning seven of those points. The primary reason he did it was that he knew Matteo was going to safely chip his return, especially from wide serves on Deuce court. He knew the ball would be sitting on a silver platter as it came over his side of the court, ripe for a sneaky serve and volley play. It was a masterful display of coming straight forward knowing that Matteo was not going to tee off and drill a return right at his feet.

It was exactly the same dynamic in the semi-final against Denis Shapovalov, especially serving wide to Denis’ backhand return in the Deuce court. Novak served and volleyed 14 times in the semi, winning 13. Masterful!!! Here’s Novak’s serve & volley points by round.

  • Rd 1 v Jack Draper = Won 7/8
  • Rd 2 v Kevin Anderson = 0
  • Rd 3 v Denis Kudla = Won 3/4
  • Rd 4 v Christian Garin =Won 1/1
  • Qtr v Marton Fucsovics = Won 5/5
  • Semi v Shapovalov = Won 13/14
  • Final v Berrettini = Won 7/9
  • Total = Won 88% (36/41)

The tournament average for serve and volley points won was 66%. Novak blew that out of the water winning 88%.

2: Dominant In Short Rallies

Rally Length Played

This was not a tournament where Novak stayed back and looked to be patient and grind and suffer. The overwhelming majority of his points played were a maximum of just two shots in the court (0-4 shot rally length).

  • 0-4 Shots = 69% (935)
  • 5-8 Shots = 20% (278)
  • 9+ Shots = 11% 153
  • Total = 1366

Which rally length did Novak dominate the most? Glad you asked!!!

  • 0-4 Shots = 533 won / 402 lost = +131
  • 5-8 Shots = 149 won / 129 lost = +20
  • 9+ Shots = 89 won / 64 lost = +25

Novak crafted his advantage much more in the 0-4 shot rally length than anywhere else. He played more there and he won more there. Novak was the king of short rallies at Wimbledon this year.

3: Net Points Won = 76% (144/190)

The tournament average for points won at the net was 66%. Novak blew that out of the water, winning 76%. Novak came to the net 190 times in 23 sets for an average of 8.3 a set. The net was an integral part of his success for the tournament. Novak came to the net 48 times in the final, winning 71% (34/48). That’s good for an average of 12 times per set. Novak was absolutely, positively hunting the short ball at the pointy end of the tournament.

4: Forehand / Backhand – Winners To Errors Ratio

It’s always good to compare winners to errors to gauge the overall performance of forehands and backhands. I am grouping forced and unforced errors into one category – simply called errors.

  • Forehands = 66 winners / 173 errors.
  • Backhands = 35 winners / 178 errors.

So this is how it breaks down as a percentage.

  • Forehands (239) = 38% winners / 62% errors.
  • Backhands (213) = 16% winners / 84% errors

So when Novak’s forehand was the last shot of the rally,  it ended with a winner 38% of the time. It only ended with a winner 16% of the time from the backhand wing. We all worship Novak’s backhand (and it is worship-worthy), but his forehand is simply the more dominant shot.

5: The Four Battle Grounds

Novak won three of the four battlegrounds he played for the tournament. The four battlegrounds reflect how the point starts – with your first or second serve or your opponent’s first or second serve. Here’s how it ended for Novak.

  1. 1st Serve Points Won = 84%
  2. 2nd Serve Points Won = 56%
  3. 2nd Serve Return Points Won = 55%
  4. 1st Serve Return Points Won = 31%

It’s interesting that Novak won almost the exact same amount of his opponent’s second serve as his own second serve.

6: Break Points Saved

The tournament average for break points saved was 61%. Novak was at 79% (26/33). The most break points he faced was against Shapovalov in the quarters. He faced 11. He saved 10. Incredibly impressive. Novak was so good in the clutch at Wimbledon this year. Getting to break point against him is a very worthy accomplishment. Actually converting the break point was all too often too big of a mountain to climb.

7: First Serves To Matteo’s Forehand In The Final

We are only going to focus on Novak’s first serves to Position 1 in the Deuce Court and Position 5 in the Ad court. Here’s how he did.

Novak First Serves

  • Position 1 = won 21/22
  • Position 5 = won 13/13
  • Combined = won 34/35

Novak had a lot of “holes” around the court that he could go to when he needed a point. Serving to Matteo’s forehand was one of them. All too often, Matteo either coughed up a return error or a sliced return that Novak could instantly attack. Matteo committed 10 return errors at Position 1. Novak hit three aces and extracted three return errors at Position 5. These serve locations were hidden gems for Novak that he focused on all throughout the match.

8: Serve +1 Performance 

Novak performed much better in the final vs. Matteo when he started the point with a forehand as the first shot after the serve.

Serve +1 Forehand Points Won

  • Novak = 61% (27/44)
  • Matteo = 48% (29/60)

Serve +1 Backand Points Won

  • Novak = 52% (17/33)
  • Matteo = 40% (16/40)

We all thought that the big hammer from the back of the court was going to be Matteo’s forehand. When you evaluate it on a stats sheet, it was actually Novak’s forehand.

9: Baseline Points Won = 53% (371/701)

The tournament average for Baseline Points Won was just 46%. Novak crushed that number, winning 53% of all points where he was standing around the baseline when the point ended. To be clear, the opponent could have been anywhere. They could have been attacking Novak at the net, or trying to trade blows with him from the back of the court.

He only won 45% (50/110) against Shapovalov in the semi-final. Not good enough. In the final against Matteo, that elevated back up to 53% baseline points won (73/137). Matteo could only manage to win 38% (54/144) in the final.

10: Short Rally Domination In the Final

In the final against Matteo, Novak was dominant when the rally stayed in the o-4 shot range. When it developed into a fifth shot in the court or longer, he actually had a losing record. But guess what… who cares when you are so dominant at the biggest slice of the pie?

Final v Berrettini

  • 0-4 Shots = Novak 104 / Matteo 85 = +19
  • 5th Shot & Longer = Novak 41 / Matteo 46 = -5

This is how winning works at all levels of our sport. There were 189 points played in 0-4, good for 69% of total points. It does not matter if you underperform in the other 31% because you are dominating the larger pool of points.

Congratulation to Novak and Matteo for a great tournament. Novak was able to add to his extensive trophy cabinet. Matteo got a brief look at what life looks like at the top of the mountain.

Cheers,

Craig

  • Tweet

The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Join 1000's of other tennis players. Enter your email address to get exclusive access to all our latest tennis strategies, including behind the scenes photos, videos & more!

Ten Tennis Strategy Products

Brain Game Tennis is the world leader researching and teaching strategy in tennis. Below are ten products to choose from to remove the guesswork and opinion from your game.

THE FIRST 4 SHOTS

The practice court is clearly broken. Here’s the proof.

Points are "front loaded". By far the majority of the action, and the winning, takes place in THE FIRST 4 SHOTS. The practice court is full of long rallies. Matches are dominated by short rallies. There is a massive disconnect occurring.

We spend too much time grinding, banging balls up and down the middle of the court – that have no real benefit to winning tennis matches.

There are 3 specific rally lengths in tennis. Here is their percentage breakdown of total points.

0-4 Shots = 70%
5-8 Shots = 20%
9+ Shots = 10%

The First 4 Shots is specifically the serve, return, Serve +1 groundstroke and Return +1 groundstroke. Those are normally the shots that get practiced the least, but matter the most to winning tennis matches.

Short Ball Hunter

The net is an extremely high percentage place to be!

If you love playing tennis for fun, spend as much time at the baseline as you like. But if you compete – if the score matters – then you must turn your attention to the net to maximize your potential.

The “herd mentality” in tennis thinks it’s too tough to approach the net in today’s game. The conversation starts with improved string technology, more powerful rackets, and finishes with stronger, faster athletes. The herd think approaching is a relic of the past. The herd is WRONG!

AVERAGE WIN %
Baseline = 46%
Net = 66%

Data from ALL Grand Slams provides the facts about approach and volley, and the data is crystal clear – it’s immensely better than staying back at the baseline, grinding for a living.

Num3ers

The baseline is a tough place to create separation. Here's how to do it.

At the 2012 US Open, only 7 men and 14 women had a winning percentage from the baseline. At Wimbledon 2016, Andy Murray won the title only winning 52% of his baseline points - and he is one of the very best at it in the world!

Num3ers deeply explores the data that rules points, especially from the back of the court. Take a "deep dive" into all three rally lengths (0-4, 5-8, 9+), and winner and errors totals from the elite level of our game. The numbers will shock you!

All 4 Grand Slams

Forcing Errors = 41% Men / 37% Women
Winners = 32% Men / 29% Women
Unforced Errors = 27% Men / 34% Women

Num3ers is very much like putting a jigsaw puzzle together. It's about bringing together different data sets together to create the big picture.

Dou8les Num3ers

Doubles Numbers

Every recorded match from the 2015 Australian Open - Rd2 to the final.

There is a lot happening on a doubles court. Situations and strategies are constantly being adjusted to create mis-matches with court position. It's hard to keep track of - until now. Dou8les Num3ers is the most comprehensive analysis of doubles data in our sport. The focus is on how a point ends, and it's broken down eight ways to Sunday. Specifically, you find critical information on:

Winners rise to the #1 way a point ends (over forced & unforced errors)

- The last shot of the rally is overwhelmingly struck at the net.
- Center Window: the most important part of a doubles court to control.
- Stephen Huss: an in-depth interview on Wimbledon's Centre Court with the 2005 Wimbledon Doubles Champion.

Dou8les Num3ers leaves no stone unturned. Percentage breakdowns of how often the server or receiver hits the last shot highlight the dramatic influence of the serve. The last shot of the rally is significant, and is broken down into the following categories: volleys, overheads, passing shots, lobs and groundstrokes.

between the points

When you play a match, you actually play two matches.

When you walk out onto a tennis court, there are two matches that you are about to play. The first is during the point - a part of the match that you have spent a lot of time preparing for on the practice court. But there is a second match, that takes place in the 20 seconds between the points. This is where the mental and emotional aspects of our sport kick in.

Let's face it, there will be adversity in almost every tennis match that you play. The storm clouds are coming. How bug they are, and how long they last for, are up to you.

Between the points is very tennis specific. It provides a roadmap for the 20 seconds between the points, teaching how to handle the adversity that will surely come, and how to build on the successes that will also be present. Your mind is your biggest asset in a match, and Between the Points takes your hand off the self destruct button and stops you beating yourself.

25 golden rules of singles strategy

You don't have to be good at everything, but you have got to be good at something.

You can break tennis down into four key elements - serving, returning, rallying and approaching. Each part has specific patterns of play that consistently deliver higher winning percentages than the others. No more guessing. No more opinions. All facets of our sport are covered in this exceptional product, clearly outlining what patterns to gravitate to, and how to best construct the practice court. Data comes primarily from the 2015 Australian Open.

Building Blocks

MEN = 70% errors / 30% winners
WOMEN = 74% errors / 26% winners

Forcing errors is the best way to construct a point.
You can simply break tennis down into primary and secondary patterns of play - and they are all covered here. Primary patterns include serve and return direction, forehands v backhands, and the best way to approach the net. Secondary patterns include drop shots, serve & volley and 1st volley options. If you play tournaments, this product will greatly help you simplify the singles court.

25 golden rules of doubles

The conversation starts & ends with the Center Window.

The doubles court is like an hourglass. There are two big ends, but a small neck in the middle where all the action happens. Once you learn the power of the Center Window, where you stand to start the point will take on a lot more significance.

Doubles is a lot more about situations, with four people on the court all "dancing" with one another. Learn all the best doubles patterns, broken down for the server, returner, server's partner and the returner's partner.

Doubles Situations

The "J" - the most ideal movement for the returner's partner to attack the net.

The "V" - a better way of understanding where the server's partner should move to.

Volley Targets - there are four main areas to attack. Know which ones are higher percentage. Beach Volleyball - the idea of a "setter" and "spiker" is ideal for the doubles court.

There are certain parts of the court that the ball travels to a lot, and other low percentage areas that you really don't want to cover at all - like the alley! In general, the serving team wants to keep the ball in the middle of the court as much as possible (to help the server's partner), while the returning team benefits from hitting wider and creating more chaos in the point.

Dirtballer

Dirtballer clay court tennis course

Getting Tight

Getting Tight tennis strategy course

Welcome to our Twitter Feed

Tweets by @BrainGameTennis

Join The #1 Tennis Strategy Newsletter

Enter your email address to get exclusive, behind the scenes photos, videos and interviews!

Contact Craig O’Shannessy







    Your Name (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Your Message

    • GET SOCIAL

    © 2019 Brain Game Tennis.
    Designed & Directed by Craig O'Shannessy

    TOP
    0